Combat Engineers provide the New Zealand Army with vital combat engineering support. As a Combat Engineer in the Army Reserve you will be trained in a variety of different specialist skills including explosive demolition, bridge construction, mine clearance, small boat handling and obstacle breaching. Although Combat Engineer is the only engineer trade that is offered in the Reserves, we are very interested in people with civilian qualifications within the other trade areas such as plumbers, electricians, carpenters or plant earth moving equipment operators. Soldiers with qualifications in these areas will predominately train as a combat engineer, but may have the opportunity to conduct some transition training so their highly valuable skills can be utilised in a military environment.
Initial training consists of three modules which equate to approximately 7 weeks of training. Mod 1 and 2 are conducted throughout the year and Mod 3 in January. It is preferable that you are able to complete these modules back to back. You will also be taught how to live in a military environment and the standards that are required of you over the next two modules.
Mod 1 and 2 are conducted annually in mid-November. The aim of this course is to produce a soldier capable of a fulfilling an appointment within an infantry section. The Mod 2 is a 28 day course conducted immediately after the Mod 1. Mod 3 is conducted in early January and is a continuation module building on skills you have learnt, and providing you with further skills to enable you to be a section member within a rifle section. This is a further 21 days of solid training, and at the completion of this module you will be ready for service and employment within your Reserve Unit.
Over the course of the three modules of training you will cover the majority of the activities that are conducted on the Regular Force All Arms Recruit Course. However, you will only be given an introduction and will continue to develop your skills within your home unit. During this course you will be introduced to the role, equipment, procedures, and drills involved in becoming a field engineer.
You will cover; combat bridge construction, boating, explosives handling and employment, search, mine clearance and battle hardening of military infrastructure.
This course will provide you with the necessary skills to be employed within a field engineer section, where you will continue to build on your training and further develop your skills in your chosen trade. As a Reservist you are paid on an hourly rate rather than a salary. Pay rates depend on the role you are in and your rank; your pay will increase as you move through the ranks.
The problem is that upon moving, the enemy if not killed will engage the section once again forcing the section to begin their battle drills anew. Therefore, winning the firefight is essential to ensure the enemy is suppressed enough to allow another group to assault the enemy position.go site
Army Basic Training to Drop Hand Grenade Competency as Graduation Requirement
To win the firefight the section commander must use proper fire control through the use of a G. Group, Range, Indication, Type of fire. This ensures that the soldiers do not run out of ammunition a common occurrence in Arma and that they are engaging the high priority targets. Concurrently with winning the fire fight, the section commander must make a combat estimate.
Having won the fire fight, he must retain the initiative by continuing to bring fire down on the enemy while he plans his attack. The section is not alone. The platoon and company may be able to provide additional direct fire support. Indirect fire support will seldom be available due to the close proximity of the section to the enemy, but it may be able to neutralize enemy supporting fire;. If there is a lull in the fight, the enemy will resume his fire and movement.
This must be avoided;. Control fire to neutralize the enemy but also to conserve ammunition for the assault and consolidation;. Once the section has suppressed the enemy enough to allow movement the section commander must give a set of quick orders to get the section moving towards the position from which they will directly assault the enemy. Speed is of the essence here and there should be no hesitation on the part of the section commander.
Fire and movement is the method of choice here in order to approach with as few casualties as possible and with the least amount of ammo expenditure. There are 3 types of fire and movement the section can employ. The one chosen will be dictated by the distance to the assault line, the amount of cover available, and the amount of return fire being received. Section Skirmish — controlled by the section commander, the section leap frogs forward with one assault group providing cover fire while the other group moves to a new position.
The distance travelled in each bound should be no more than meters depending on the terrain and enemy contact. Group Skirmish — one group is controlled by the section commander and the other by the 2IC. Team Skirmish — each team is controlled by the team leader. Each soldier provides cover fire for the other. I could be wrong about this, I readily admit that. As an aside, I find it hilarious that so many practitioners of modern combatives systems are extremely critical of traditional martial arts and their emphasis on lineage.
I find it funny that those very same people then feel the need to claim special forces units as their own lineage, as if that increases their skills in any way. But I digress…. Military hand-to-hand combat systems in action. There is no doubt that members of military special units kick ass and take names. No doubt at all because they have proven just that for hundreds of years. The underlying attraction of the hand-to-hand systems they practice is rooted in that fact. But does that mean they are the best hand-to-hand fighters in the world? If you look at the total amount of training hours for instance the Marine Corps Martial Arts Program requires to reach their black belt level, you end up with about hours.
A while ago, I asked a bunch of former and active military personnel how many hours they trained hand-to-hand combat during their service. In all fairness, some of the feedback I got was about how soldiers train on their own in both combatives as well as shooting. But actual scheduled training time? Without exception, the total number of hours was extremely low. For some, there was only a few hours of annual training.
'A Sense of Entitlement'
Others had weekly training but only a couple hours. For pretty much all of them, the training of other skills took up way, way more time.
It was generally looked down upon in the office for Officers to participate in things like combatives. In other words: even in this specialized part of basic training was next to no room for hand-to-hand combat. I guess it was two or three hours out of three months with little sleep. And finally, a quote from perhaps one of the deadliest soldiers I know.
Somebody who will remain anonymous for obvious reasons:. The image of an elite soldier spending all his time doing hardcore combatives is just wrong, no matter how much the ads want to make you believe it. Like I said above, other training and duties take up most of the time. About 30m per day on weapons maintenance, manipulation and dry fire; with hours per week live fire mostly done at my own expense… PT is about 2 hours per day, split into 1 hour sessions, 3 on 1 off 2 on one off. So why on earth would anyone consider him a hand-to-hand-combat specialist? He specializes in being an insanely effective and deadly professional soldier.
Hand-to-hand combat systems are only a very small part of that job description. But primarily because of his mind-set, experience and professionalism. Not because the combatives techniques he learned in the military are superior to all other systems.
The reasoning is that if these techniques are used in gruesome missions during a war, then they must be the best thing since sliced bread for self-defense. First up, context. The context in which these techniques are applicable are completely different from your daily life: military operations have rules of engagement and operational parameters that vary from one mission to the next. A civilian self-defense situation however has to be resolved following the law. Look up the self-defense laws of your own country for the details, but civilian law is generally pretty clear in that you need specific components to be present before you can use lethal force or any force at all for that matter.
A soldier has to complete his mission, whatever the objectives may be. But as a civilian, this is usually the best option for you as far as the law is concerned: if you have a means to escape, you should use it. If your mission as a civilian escape and be safe is not the same as that Seal take out the target , then why would you use the exact same tools? Second is teamwork. A while ago another friend of mine former special forces and extremely experienced soldier made a bunch of people arguing about self-defense go quiet.
Unlike you as a civilian, soldiers do not go out by their lonesome selves to kill enemies; they go as a team. This means their entire mindset is completely different from a civilian like you or me who has to defend himself with a force of only one. Their techniques and tactics reflect that. Soldiers do not use hand-to-hand combat techniques unless they absolutely have to.
If they do; it usually means they either fucked up or something went wrong. Some examples:.
Recruit training - Wikipedia
In all of the above scenarios, something happened that prevented them from using their tool of choice: a high-performance firearm. So why would they choose a tool hand-to-hand combat techniques that offers inferior performance and reliability over another firearms that is readily available to them? But when exactly does a civilian need for instance sentry removal techniques for self-defense? When you read those book and video advertisements, the ad copy suggest you get the authentic combat system as taught to that particular elite unit.
Army training: Bayonets out, ‘ab blasters’ in
If you think about it in light of what I wrote here above, that should strike you as strange. Why would a civilian learn techniques that were never meant to be used outside of a military context? To illustrate this context, take a look a this video featuring W. Fairbairn , who is one of the fathers of modern combatives.
As a civilian, you are only allowed to use lethal force under very specific circumstances, as I explained above. If your first instinct in a self-defense situation is to cripple or kill your aggressor, get ready to spend time in jail. Would military hand-to-hand combat systems be useful then?
Yes they would, they work real well for that. Because the vast majority of self-defense situations do not require lethal force. Lethal force is not justified in those cases, so using it would be murder. Which is exactly what those combatives techniques are for, remember?
Many but not all instructors do realize this and water down what they teach. Some do so because they understand the difference between civilian and military contexts.
Related Military Combat Drills! | Boxing | Sentry Removal | Grenade Throwing
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved