Bruce G. Blair
Email: m. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues.
- NAE Website - Enhancing the Acceptability and Credibility of a Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel.
- Authentic American Indian Beadwork and How to Do It: With 50 Charts for Bead Weaving and 21 Full-Size Patterns for Applique.
- Christ ist erstanden - Score.
- Easter Mice!!
Learn more. If you have previously obtained access with your personal account, Please log in. If you previously purchased this article, Log in to Readcube.
Log out of Readcube. Click on an option below to access.click here
VTLS Chameleon iPortal Browse Results
Log out of ReadCube. Despite decades of effort, the nuclear industry does not yet have a working solution for managing spent fuel and high level waste, the most radioactive products generated by nuclear power plants. Apart from a minority of countries, most countries have not chosen any sites for a repository. One reason for the absence of operating repositories decades after they were first proposed is widespread public opposition to such facilities.
Polls have revealed that substantial majorities of people consider nuclear waste with dread and do not approve plans to dispose of radioactive wastes near them, or, often, far away either. Nuclear power advocates have typically dismissed public concerns as resulting from a lack of understanding of scientific facts but this explanation does not withstand scrutiny.
Technical approaches to dealing with nuclear waste, such as reprocessing of spent fuel, mischaracterize the social concerns and therefore do not help gain public acceptance. Concern about radioactive waste has contributed to the failure of the propaganda effort by the nuclear industry to market nuclear power as a solution to climate change. The absence of a solution to waste negatively affects the future expansion of nuclear energy.
MIT announced that it has now released a report on The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle because "of the continuing importance of nuclear power as a low-carbon option that could be deployed at a scale that is material for mitigating climate change risk, namely, global deployment at the terawatt scale by mid-century.
It added, "Because of the significant changes in the landscape, we have undertaken this study This study aims to inform those decisions. The report states, "A key message from our work is that we can and should preserve our options for fuel cycle choices by continuing with the open fuel cycle, implementing a system for managed light water reactor LWR spent fuel storage, developing a geological repository, and researching technology alternatives appropriate to a range of nuclear energy futures.
Article First Online: 15 December This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Google Scholar. Carter, J. Budushchee atomnoi energetiki.
- Along the Road to Arcadia.
- Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter.?
- Radioactive waste - Wikipedia;
- Heaven on Earth book 1;
- SQUARE RUNG II.
- To Recycle or Not to Recycle? An Intergenerational Approach to Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Featured channels!
- Nuclear Fuels Storage & Transportation Planning Project Documents!
- Papo Furado - E-flat Lead Sheet.
Zhiznin, S. Scientific and technical basis for the geological disposal of radioactive wastes, Tech. Planning and design considerations for geological repository programmes of radioactive waste, Tech. Bunn, M.
Von Hippel, F. Global Secur. CrossRef Google Scholar. Lagus, T. Orszag, Director: Costs of Reprocessing vs. La Tourrette, T.
Related Managing Spent Nuclear Fuel: Strategy Alternatives and Policy Implications
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved